The Horror Review: EST: 1999

  A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

 Film Title: A Nightmare on Elm Street Year Released: 2010
Reviewed By: Steven west
Movie Website:  Click Here Bookmark and Share
Overall Stars: * Scare Factor: *

 

   The latest Platinum Dunes remake, a year on from FRIDAY THE 13TH, is their weakest. It displays mild promise at the outset via an effectively eerie title sequence accompanied by Steve Jablosnkys otherwise generic score offering a creepy appropriation of the originals memorable Charles Bernstein theme. Thereafter, NIGHTMARE 2010 stutters, meanders and, even more so than anything Michael Bays horror remake outfit has yet produced, pales in comparison to the Wes Craven movie which possessed all the wit, shock value and imagination so lacking here.

   As with FRIDAY THE 13TH 2009, this remake of the original is selective about what it directly quotes from the original and steals elements from some of the sequels to throw into the stew (including a diner right out of PART 4 THE DREAM MASTER). Freddy wisecracks are taken from various sources (Hows this for a wet dream? is used in a different context) and theres a bunch of iconic images borrowed from Craven, albeit with a tiny fraction of the impact they once had. Thus, the haunting dead-friend-in-a-body-bag recurring image of the 1984 film is used once, seemingly just for the sake of a reference rather than providing any resonance with the story. Freddys glove still appears between the legs of the heroine (Rooney Mara) as she bathes, but this time theres no pay-off. And theres still the moment where Freddys grim visage protrudes through the wall of a sleeping character - though weve moved on in cinematic terms to the point where its now fully CG and looks totally ridiculous.

   So what else is new? Freddy Krueger is now played by Jackie Earle Haley, a clever casting choice (Haley played a genuinely unsettling neighborhood pedophile in LITTLE CHILDREN) though the actor does more for the film than it does for him. The heroine is still called Nancy, but someone forgot to order a personality and the charming Heather Langenkamp (among others) is sorely missed. All the teen protagonists - pithily drawn in the original - are now interchangeable, glum survivors of child abuse committed by school gardener Freddy and suppressed in their memory banks until now.

   Perhaps because merely murdering children is now less shocking and unforgivable than merely molesting them, the living Freddy is no longer a child-killer, though the parental lynch mob that burned him and turned him into what he has now become, remains the same. The difference being that the pursuit and killing of Krueger is now depicted in straight-forward nightmare flashbacks ; somehow, the event was far creepier when described by the excellent Ronee Blakely in the Craven flick. In place of the memorable Johnny Depp, Amanda Wyss (who did more to make an appealing character in ten minutes than anyone here does in 90) and Nick Corri are a heroine with no zest whatsoever and a hero (Kyle Gallner) in the Depp role who wears a Joy Division T-shirt that turns out to be the most upbeat and interesting thing about him.

   Notable for their absence are unforgettable moments from the original, like the phone tongue, the geyser of blood that represents Johnny Depps demise and various other bits of scary businessbut when you see how weakly the Tina stand-in characters demise is duplicated, you start to feel grateful for small mercies.

   Oddly, this new version, which cost $35 million, moves far slower than the low-budget 1984 movie, and somehow looks and feels more dated than Cravens film ever has. Its shortcomings serve to highlight Cravens gift for economic storytelling, and it replaces his superbly disorientating rubber-reality and surrealistic nightmare imagery with a listless structure and no sense of terror in or out of the nightmare world. One-note performances and repetitive, visually unimaginative dreamscapes keep it from ever truly engaging.

   Haley does his best. The revised, more authentically charred make-up is certainly grim, though this concession to realism and other modifications to the iconic character do the film no favors. The efforts to reinvent Krueger as fairly pitiful paedo results in some unnerving moments (Nancy in a childs dress at the finale being leeched over) but the plodding script (lets give a big yawn for internet-based exposition!) is often misguided, with a detour in which the protagonists insist Krueger was actually innocent of the crimes and the parents made a grave error in burning him! Adding further insult is the reliance on loud jump scares and hackneyed shocks that reduce the scariness rather than increasing it.

   Significantly, the one and only bum note of the original was a silly shock coda built around a goofy effect that bore all the hallmarks of having been added in post-production and made no real sense in the context of what had gone before. This has been replaced by a silly shock coda with a goofy (CG) effect that has all the hallmarks of having been added in post-production andah, you get the picture.

   Kudos for one thing : neat use of the Everly Brothers All I Have To Do Is Dream ; demerits for re-using the ghostly kids singing the Freddy rhyme despite the fact that, as this Freddy didn't actually murder kids in his former existence, there shouldn’tt really be any ghostly kids around to do this kind of thing.

- Steven West

 

The Horror Review © Copyright 1999/2009 - Present. All rights reserved.

All Reviews on this website are strictly the opinion of The Horror Review team and do not express the opinion of any one else but their own.

 All films reviewed are copyrighted with their respected owners and the United States Copyright Office.

 Please do not take anything from this site without the permission of The Webmaster 

 Click here to buy movie posters!
Click here to buy movie posters!

 

wordpress visitors






Hosting Provided By HORRORFIND.COM
To find out about advertising on the Horrorfind Network Click Here